John Pilger Interview: Mainstream Media and Imperial Power
by Dennis J Bernstein and Randy Credico via gail - Consortium News Thursday, Jan 25 2018, 10:03pm
Naturally, John Pilger is here expressing his opinion, alone.
As a group of highly specialised young (millennials) with various professional skills ranging from computer science (expert coders and reverse engineers) to mass media/communications, marketing, PR, journalism, advertising, to name only a few areas of expertise -- we also have a group of expert hackers that do not have degrees or orthodox qualifications -- now paid extremely well by Big Tech in California for their services, which I would emphasise does not preclude them from their favourite pursuit -- HACKING, which is more lucrative than their front jobs. Indeed, as Pilger states when he refers to young journalists, we are cynical and for very good reason, as we have individually removed the superimposed psychological and digital chains of slavery which we were insidiously exposed to since we could think.
The point is, if we were able to free ourselves individually without assistance and find each other later in life, we expect that, with assistance, the masses should also be able to do the same. However, cold reality dictates they are thoroughly incapable -- useless in fact -- and actually prefer their chains to taking responsibility for their lives and the direction their respective democratic nations take, regardless of all the efforts made by numerous groups and yourself, to free them.
So what would you, Mr Pilger? How effective, in real world terms/scenarios, have your and Assange's efforts been? Reality speaks for itself and it -- the world -- is a social and physical (environmental) horror! Created of course by nefarious mega-wealthy elite forces that are driven by their psychotic, extremely sick personalities to pursue evermore profit/power at ANY cost, though they too are aware that their nihilistic pursuits could only end in dystopia, entropy and utter ruin -- yet they manically persist, such is flawed human nature.
The world has always been shaped by opposing elite forces, tiny elite factions against mega-powerful elite groups, and if history is any indication, the small always overcomes the large, however, it appears that TODAY, the methods of inculcated mass slavery (and social paralysis) have won. The herd or drone masses are entirely aware they are SLAVES, yet they do not lift a finger TOGETHER to free themselves, which highlights how effective social media/digital alienation, 'ME' etc, is and has been. The herd is fuckin' useless, hence our cynicism, unless of course you would care to prove otherwise -- give it your best shot, Mr Pilger.
Nevertheless, we do not intend to withdraw from the fight/war or ever capitulate; we would never cease opposing the nefarious forces hell-bent on destruction, which also enslave and slaughter the masses at a whim.
We are Mr Pilger, human beings and our cynicism does not prevent us meeting our obligation to other human beings -- the majority of which, I personally wouldn't piss on if they were on fire -- though our efforts are largely ignored but noticed nevertheless.
We are indeed a biologically programmed social species, and we all share the common passion to make things right -- to harmonise rather than create chaos and death, which our parasitic opposition thrives on.
Nevertheless stark reality dictates it is a losing social battle today and that the world must undergo massive shock therapy before it collectively wakes up, which would probably come in the form of an entirely preventable nuclear war and massive geological changes triggered by same. And so it must be. You would note the imperative.
Massive avalanches are triggered by the slightest perturbation, though it takes time for the circumstances to build to a critical mass, as indeed has occurred globally today. The madmen planning what they absurdly imagine would be a managed nuclear war are clearly delusional, but you see, the failing American empire, must 'win;' you would remember that Vietnam war adage, "we had to destroy the village in order to save the village." And that is the INSANITY of America today, Mr Pilger. All your, our and the efforts of others to reverse this trend are CLEARLY ineffective and therefore futile, though the fight must go on.
Interview from Consortium News follows:
Noted journalist and filmmaker John Pilger’s collection of work has been archived by the British Library, but deep-rooted problems of Western media create an increasingly difficult landscape for ethical journalism, as Pilger explained in an interview with Dennis Bernstein and Randy Credico.
Copyright applies to external text.
By Dennis J Bernstein and Randy Credico
Emmy award-winning filmmaker John Pilger is among the most important political filmmakers of the 20th and 21st century. From Vietnam to Palestine to atomic war, Pilger’s work has been on the cutting edge, and his stinging critique of western media has always be revelatory. And, no doubt, his biting analysis is more relevant and important now than ever. His latest film, “The Coming War on China” powerfully presages the growing potential for war between the US and China.
Randy Credico and Dennis J Bernstein spoke with Pilger on January 18 about the multiple failures of the corporate press in fanning the phony flames of Russiagate, and turning its back on Julian Assange–acting more like prosecutors than journalists, whose responsibility it is to monitor the centers of power and report back to the people.
They also spoke with Pilger about the recent decision by the British Library to acquire his substantial works and invaluable archives and make them readily available to a much wider audience
Dennis Bernstein: Congratulations, John. Your work has now been made a part of the collection at the British Library.
John Pilger: To see all my written work over the years go onto a single hard drive was a sobering experience. I am pleased, however, because now in the digital age people can access all of my work and I myself can access information I may have forgotten.
Dennis Bernstein: I would like to read a little of what they said on the record when they welcomed your material into the library. They write, “Throughout his career, John Pilger has demonstrated the power and significance of investigative journalism in uncovering stories of people who have been ignored by the mainstream media or left otherwise without voice. His groundbreaking work in Cambodia revealed the devastation caused by the Khmer Rouge and his film Year Zero: The Silent Death of Cambodia has subsequently been described as one of the ten most influential documentaries of the twentieth century.”
I would like to read now a little of the statement that you sent to the World’s Socialist Conference where they were discussing the deep nature of censorship. You wrote, “Something has changed. Although the media was always a loose extension of capital power, it is now almost fully integrated. Dissent, once tolerated in the mainstream, has now regressed to a metaphoric underground as liberal capitalism moves toward a form of corporate dictatorship.” And it is getting worse at an exponential rate, wouldn’t you say?
John Pilger: Yes. Chris Hedges is an example of that. He was right in the mainstream at The New York Times and now finds himself outside it. Another example is America’s most celebrated investigative journalist, Seymour Hersh, who it appears now can only get published in Germany. Hersh has effectively been ejected from the mainstream in the United States.
In my own case, I navigated my way through the mainstream. My films are still shown on commercial TV in Britain. My written journalism, however, is no longer welcome. Its last home was The Guardian, which three years ago got rid of people like me and others in a kind of purge of those who were saying what The Guardian no longer says anymore.
That has happened right across the liberal media. The Washington Post–which is at the moment going through a period of self-aggrandizement with the release of the film The Post–is also the notorious source of a site which listed some of the most distinguished dissenting sites in the United States, including Consortiumnews, Black Agenda Report, Counterpunch and others, as sources of Russian propaganda. It is forcing all of us into this margin, when really the mainstream is in the margin and the margin is in the mainstream.
Dennis Bernstein: Could you talk about the work of Julian Assange in the context of this corporate censorship machine?
John Pilger: Julian Assange has personally borne the brunt of much of this historic shift. He and Wikileaks have exposed so much, and that is unforgivable. There is no doubt that what Wikileaks has done is the most important disclosure journalism of my lifetime. Around the world, politicians who have been deceiving the public have been caught out by the revelations of Wikileaks. It is quite an epic achievement.
Anger has been directed at Julian by people in the media who have been shamed by Wikileaks. Because Wikileaks did the job that journalists ought to have been doing for many years. Wikileaks has done it across such a spectrum and put to shame those who are paid to keep the record straight. That has been Assange’s crime.
Dennis Bernstein: It has come to the point where to tell the truth is to commit professional suicide.
Randy Credico: At the recent World Socialist Conference, Julian Assange warned of what he called the “super states” on the internet and how much power they have–the Facebooks and Googles, etc.
John Pilger: He raised the whole specter of artificial intelligence and how it can be abused by the undemocratic forces that control so much of the world. I think what he had to say was very interesting and extremely timely. It is important to remember that Assange is a refugee and that the refugee is almost a symbol of our times. There are those who try to cross the Mediterranean and don’t make it or who cross deserts to get work to support their families.
Julian is a political refugee who is trying to inform us of something we either don’t know about or are unwilling to talk about. The United Nations has recognized that he is being detained unlawfully. It is interesting to hear what he says but we also have to keep an eye on his welfare. His situation should be a burning issue for journalists everywhere. If it can happen to him, it can happen to any of us.
Randy Credico: A lot of mainstream journalists complain when Trump refers to them as the enemy of the people, but they have shown themselves to be very unwilling to circle the wagons around Assange. What is the upshot for journalists of Assange being taken down?
John Pilger: Trump knows which nerves to touch. His campaign against the mainstream media may even help to get him re-elected, because most people don’t trust the mainstream media anymore.
In my experience as a journalist, the public have always been ahead of the media. And yet, in many news outlets there has always been a kind of veiled contempt for the public. You find young journalists affecting a false cynicism that they think ordains them as journalists. The cynicism is not about the people at the top, it’s about the people at the bottom, the people that Hillary Clinton dismissed as “irredeemable.”
CNN and NBC and the rest of the networks have been the voices of power and have been the source of distorted news for such a long time. They are not circling the wagons because the wagons are on the wrong side. These people in the mainstream have been an extension of the power that has corrupted so much of our body politic. They have been the sources of so many myths.
This latest film about The Post neglects to mention that The Washington Post was a passionate supporter of the Vietnam War before it decided to have a moral crisis about whether to publish the Pentagon Papers. Today, The Washington Post has a $600 million deal with the CIA to supply them with information.
Media in the West is now an extension of imperial power. It is no longer a loose extension, it is a direct extension. Whether or not it has fallen out with Donald Trump is completely irrelevant. It is lined up with all the forces that want to get rid of Donald Trump. He is not the one they want in the White House, they wanted Hillary Clinton, who is safer and more reliable.
<< back to stories